Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Illuminate the Lies & Legalize Cannabis ("marijuana")

I jumped in on an impassioned discussion resulting from comments Pat Robertson recently made regarding the plant we know as "marijuana". I call it by it's real name, cannabis. (for an eyeopening discovery, google how it got its new name).

For once Pat and I agree on something!



Here's what I had to say in response to comments in favor of continued incarceration of "marijuana" users because of its negative effects on a person, physically, socially, and mentally:

The real question here is not whether or not something is harmful but rather whether anyone has the natural right to lock another up for harming themself. We tried that with alcohol......remember?

Take a look at how drugs rank in a study by UK professor, David Nutt.

Photobucket 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt

Here's another graph which is a little easier to read:

Photobucket http://lsdimension.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/bbc-horizon-is-alcohol-worse%C2%A0than%C2%A0ecstasy/
Is Alcohol Worse than Ecstasy?
 1. Heroin 2. Cocaine ..... 5. Alcohol .... 9. Tobacco ... 11.Cannabis


Additionally, cannabis would greatly help my husband who suffers severe pain from sickle cell. It would be incredibly safer and better for him to use cannabis than use morphine (the regularly prescribed drug for sickle cell pain crisis) which is nothing less than a more slowly absorbed HEROIN, and equally addictive at a slightly larger dose!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphine
"Diacetylmorphine (better known as heroin) was synthesized from morphine in 1874 and brought to market by Bayer in 1898. Heroin is approximately 1.5 to 2 times more potent than morphine on a milligram-for-milligram basis. Due to the lipid solubility of diacetylmorphine, it is able to cross the blood-brain barrier faster than morphine, subsequently increasing the reinforcing component of addiction."
 Drug Library: Morphine and Heroin
"The only significant difference between them is that the acetyl molecule allows heroin to cross the blood-brain barrier more quickly than ordinary morphine."
Even the government lumps both the illegal heroin and legal morphine together http://www.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/job185drugs/morphine.htm

NOTE: #15, Methylphenidate, is what we commonly refer to as "Ritalin", the drug millions of kids take daily, is more harmful than anabolic steroids and ecstasy. Ecstasy is apparently not the danger it's believed to be (only 10 UK deaths a yr from ecstasy vs thousands from alcohol use), and Ritalin isn't as harmless as we're supposed to think.

The most telling bit of info I've found in all my cannabis reading is that while we're being told that cannabis is the worst kind of evil, big pharma wasted no time patenting synthetic versions of THC (the active AND SUPPOSEDLY DANGEROUS ingredient in the cannabis plant). AND the CDC has never had the pleasure of reporting a single death from "marijuana", meaning you can't overdose.
"Marinol" an FDA approved synthetic version of THC is responsible for at least 4 deaths. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol (scroll to "Dronabinol")


Other drugs prescribed in place of "marijuana" claimed 192 lives between 97-05. http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000145

It might cost a chronic sufferer a few dollars to grow their own never-ending supply of cannabis. Guess how much the Marinol pills cost? $200+/30 capsules. http://www.healthpricer.com/marinol-25mg-compare-prices/5242255.html

Other Facebook commenters were covering the Constitution aspect, so I stuck to educating the FB masses on the scientific info most people just don't know, and don't care to find out. Watching a "30 Days" episode I learned that over 50% of our prison population are drug-only offenders. Imagine if they were all convicted of drinking, making, or selling alcohol, like in the prohibition. It's the same thing, only many of these drugs they used, cannabis in particular, are FAR less harmful than alcohol and FDA approved pharmaceutical drugs. I'm glad we learned our lesson, and my 10+ family members and myself aren't locked up in prison right now for our past or continuous alcohol use. My heart breaks for those who are and their loved ones who suffer this needless destruction of families.

The list of things I can do that have the potential to harm me both accidentally (driving, using bleach, mountain climbing), or intentionally (stabbing myself in the leg, jumping off my roof, banging my head on concrete) is INFINITE. None of those things are illegal, and rightfully so. I have no right to come and forcibly keep you from any of those activities, or punish you in any way after the fact. Yet we allowed the authorities to do that very thing.

I think Thomas Jefferson said it best.
"But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

Thursday, March 11, 2010

USA: It's now illegal to buy firearms while known to be "disgruntled"!???

http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100309/NEWS/3090315
http://www.theangrypatriot.com/?p=364

The home of an Oregon man, reportedly disgruntled over being placed on administrative leave from his job at the Department of Transportation, was descended on by Oregon State Police, Jackson and Douglas county sheriff departments, and the Medford and Roseburg police departments despite his breaking NO law. The action involved the dawn evacuation of neighbors homes. Hostage negotiators and SWAT were called in, though no laws were broken, to convinced the man to "voluntarily surrender to SWAT" and subject himself to a mental-health examination because he purchased several firearms within days of his alleged state of upset over losing his job. 

HOLD UP Y'ALL! Let me see if I understand. It is illegal to purchase a gun if someone has told police that you are really, really, really upset about something? WHAAAAAAAAAAATTTT??? Are you kidding me? Is this the twilight zone? Somebody wake me up! How do you get so many people in close proximity willing to violate basic human rights like this???? I've got a message for those yellow-bellied (probably a few with a God-complex) "law enforcement" officers: READ THE CONSTITUTION WHICH YOU ARE SWORN TO UPHOLD AND DEFEND!!!

I shudder to think what would have happened if he'd (legally) refused. The firearm purchases were legal, and included the required Oregon State Police background checks. Authorities were reportedly "extremely concerned" that he may be planning retaliation against his employer, and subsequently "took a proactive approach" (See it here: KDRV video)  rather than the usual reactive....you know when a CRIME has actually been committed!? NO CRIMINAL CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED -- of course because no crime was committed! -- yet, the 3 recently purchased firearms, along with 2 he owned prior to losing his job, were confiscated. It is unclear if the man is still being held illegally. Heads must roll!


Amendment IV to the US CONSTITUTION reads:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and
seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue,
but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched,
and the persons or things to be seized."


The irony: According to the SUPREME COURT of these United States, this man could have LEGALLY KILLED ALL OFFICERS trying to arrest him illegally with the very weapons they confiscated.

http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm

“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).


“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

Please contact the alleged involved agencies tomorrow to find out on what authority they claim to have detained this man. The local news stations only report the Medford Police, so at least call or email them to ask what's going on?

Reported Involved Agengies:
Douglas County Sheriff, http://www.dcso.com/contact_numbers_N.htm
Jackson County Sheriff, http://www.co.jackson.or.us/Page.asp?NavID=197 (scroll way down for phone #)
Oregon State Police, http://www.oregon.gov/OSP/contact_us.shtml
Medford Police, http://www.ci.medford.or.us/SectionIndex.asp?SectionID=7 (bottom-left)
Roseburg Police, http://www.cityofroseburg.com/police/index.php

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Joe Stack Suicide Note (copied moments before taken down)

Note originally posted at http://embeddedart.com


If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?”  The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time.  The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken.  Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it.  I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head.  Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy.  Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all.  We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers.  Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”.  I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood.  These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind.  Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours?  Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies.  Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”.  It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system?  Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand.  Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand.  The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is.  If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s.  Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English.  Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions.  In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy.  We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God).  We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living.  However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0.  It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie.  It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father.  I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.  My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker.  Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement.  Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement.  All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time.  When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me).  I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread.  I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made.  I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer... and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).

SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.

Note:

·      "another person" is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

·      "taxpayer" is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

·      "individual", "employee", or "worker" is you.



Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated.  The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d).  Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave.  Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time.  I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity.  This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”.  Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise.  The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists).  This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle.  If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks.  Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s.  Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that.  The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco.  However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall.  Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed.  Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare.  Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months.  This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive.  Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY!  After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change.  Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while.  So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done.  I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work.  The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA.  This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income.  I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need.  The sleazy government decided that they disagreed.  But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out.  Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present.  After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again.  But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle.  After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order.  I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting.  Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit.  By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented).  Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone.  The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything.  Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”.  Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone.  The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government.  Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough).  In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand.  It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants.  I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after.  But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change.  I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less.  I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are.  Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer.  The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different.  I am finally ready to stop this insanity.  Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.



The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.



Joe Stack (1956-2010)

02/18/2010

Thursday, January 28, 2010

My Shrimp Alfredo Recipe

I couldn't find just one recipe that appealed to me, so I grabbed ingredients from a few, and added some of my own. It was so delicious, I wanted to share! Many of the measurements below can be varied to taste, and ingredients omitted or substituted. Just be careful not to add too much flour.


SHRIMP ALFREDO

Pasta

1 tsp salt
1 Tbsp oil
1 lb pasta of your choice

Start boiling water for pasta. Add salt and oil to water. (At this point, start on your sauce.) Follow directions on box. Pour sauce over noodles**

Sauce

1 stick butter, unsalted
6 cloves garlic, minced
1/2 medium onion, minced
1.5 lbs shelled deveined shrimp, cooked
1 tsp dried parsley
5 Tbsp flour
1 pint half-n-half
8 oz parmesan cheese, grated
salt to taste

While water boils, melt butter in a large skillet over medium heat. Add onion and garlic. Cook about two minutes, until onion becomes translucent. Add shrimp and parsley, cooking just until heated. TURN OFF HEAT. Next, add one Tbsp of flour at a time, until mixture thickens a bit, but is still very moist. (If a lot of water cooks off your shrimp, you'll need more flour.) Slowly pour half-n-half into skillet while stirring. Heat over med-high heat until slightly thickened. TURN TO LOW HEAT, then mix in parmesan cheese until melted. The more cheese you add, and the longer you cook, the thicker the sauce will be. Add salt to taste.

**I return noodles to the pot and immediately combine with sauce so that my noodles don't have a chance to dry out. However, the shrimp tends to fall under the noodles. If you do this, make sure each bowl gets enough shrimp!

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Primary Jury Responsibility: JUDGE THE LAW

Jurors have the power and responsibility to vote "not guilty", even if the evidence in the case proves a "crime" was committed, if they judge the law to be unjust or unconstitutional. Most jurors will never know this because the majority of Judges no longer make them aware. Many, if not most, actually instruct juries to decide the case by applying the law, as it is given to them, to the evidence. This is not the law, nor the precedence. A juror can and should disregard a judge's instructions, if he sees fit, judging both fact and law according to his conscience. This is jury nullification.

The doctrine is supported by these 1.) A jury can never be punished for a verdict it returns. 2.) Once acquitted, one can not be tried for the same crime again (double jeopardy).

Legal definition of "jury". Pay attention to "jury verdict" section. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jury

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

The first case of jury nullification was in 1670 when Williams Mead and Penn were arrested for "unlawful assembly", violating a law designed to prevent any religious expression not approved by the crown. The judge demanded a return verdict of "guilty", but the jury repeatedly refused, resulting in the imprisonment of four jurors. A higher court ultimately overturned the ruling, establishing the common law practice of juries judging on conscience.

John Peter Zenger, who in 1735 was tried for the crime of "seditious libel". The British ruled Colony of New York did not permit its citizens freedom of press, and when Zenger published articles criticizing the Governor, he was arrested and jailed for 10 months. Any publication that "brings into hatred or contempt for government" or "civil unrest", even if truthful, was illegal. The evidence in the case proved that a crime had indeed been committed. Though he argued that the information he printed was true, therefore justification for the libel, this is not why Zenger was acquitted. The judge instructed the jury that their only responsibility was to find guilt because he had violated the letter of the law, and that the "issue of law" was to be left to the court to decide. Nonetheless, in a mere ten minutes the jury returned with a verdict of "not guilty".

Wiki-Seditious Libel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seditious_libel

The US government is a system of checks and balances, of which trial by jury is the final and most crucial; perhaps the true meaning of "government by the people, for the people". Thomas Jefferson is quoted as saying in 1789, "I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution." This is the only REAL tool WE THE PEOPLE have to keep government in check. We are not their minions; they are our servants. In 1895 the US Supreme Court ruled that although juries do have the right to judge both the facts of the case, and the law itself, and to disregard the instructions of the judge, no one is required to tell them of this right. One must wonder what the motive to keep the rights of a jury a tightly guarded secret.

In this old TV show, "At Issue", (from The National Endowment For Liberty), Ron Paul and a panel of experts discuss the power of the jury and expose the Judge's dirty little secret.


This article http://www.ehow.com/how_2140173_avoid-jury-nullification.html" caught my eye. It details how to avoid jury nullification (I guess to the rookie prosecutor). And for what purpose? To save time...money...something more sinister? Can we trust anyone who puts ANY objective above that of justice? The idea that public knowledge of the true power and responsibility of a jury creates a problem for the courts is outrageous! But the fact remains that this critical information is being intentionally withheld by most judges, making it quite obvious that the American public is in fact pitted against the very system we trust to deliver justice. That's a scary thought! But perhaps that mentality is where we went wrong. We really have no one to thank but ourselves. When did we stop paying attention and become so complacent? Time to make up for lost time. Get educated and then tell somebody-lots of people-the truth!

http://www.fija.org
FIJA.ORG

Monday, January 25, 2010

Safe Entertainment or Parental Compromise?

How many of you parents trust sites like nick.com to provide your child with good, clean fun. How many of us-some on a daily basis-trust these sites to do so without our supervision. We all know that we should know what our kids are watching, playing, and listening to, but how easy it is to become complacent. Once your kids are in the habit of watching one or two mom-approved shows on a given network, or a handful of games on a dad-verified website, do you, on a daily basis, (re)evaluate the content they're accessing? I know I'm not.

It's been brought to my attention that there are free internet games accessible from nick.com that are extremely inappropriate for children (or anyone IMO). Though the games actually "live" on a separate website, addictinggames.com, they blend right in with all the rest, some clickable directly from the main page of nick.com. Addictinggames.com was purchased by Viacom, which also owns Nickelodeon. http://www.viacom.com/ourbrands/medianetworks/mtvnetworks/pages/addictinggames.aspx

(Watch the video to see the inappropriate content.)


I share this information with you not so much to point fingers and hurl blame at Nickelodeon or any other entity. I share this with you as I, myself, take a long, hard look at my own media-monitoring practices. The dad who made this video has given me a welcome wake-up call. Viacom is certainly not the only corporation out there that parents regularly, virtually blindly, trust to "police" the internet, television waves, and games our children are exposed to. Lately, I've increasingly become conscious of just how excessive my own children's media consumption is, in general, and just this morning decided to (once again) make attempts to curb this addiction. And, don't get me wrong, the addiction is just as much my own (free babysitting right??), as it is my children's, though I'm certain the withdrawal will be harder for them than myself since I've given them little motivation to be very discriminatory in their viewing/playing. I also don't get up off my butt, or away from my computer, often enough to help them find something more healthy, productive, and FUN to do. Even my desire to get my bedroom cleaned, dishes done, or floor mopped interfere with my responsibility to teach my children to recognize healthy, constructive hobbies vs those that consume way too much of our time-our most valuable resource-and give us little of real value in return.

It wasn't until discussing this video on a friend's FB today that I realized that all the good-intentions in the world are not going to keep my kids safe. It's like knowing the ibuprofen should be kept out of reach of children, but leaving it on the nightstand anyway. Will I wait until one of my children "overdoses" on inappropriate TV, music, or videogames before I take some real action; before I REALLY start protecting them? This video lit a fire of urgency and encouragement under me that I needed! Nickelodeon has completely lost my trust, and for now, erring on the side of safety, my family will seek our entertainment elsewhere, and in EXTREMELY limited doses. Time to blow the dust off of Monopoly and the Uno cards!

Kudos to you parents who have been vigilant all along! Best wishes to those like myself who will make up for lost time, hoping it's not too late!


Anyone interested in contacting Viacom or Nickelodeon about this matter, use the following:

Viacom Inc.
1515 Broadway
New York, New York 10036
(212) 258-6000
http://www.viacom.com/Contact/Pages/default.aspx

Nickelodeon
1515 Broadway
New York, N.Y. 10036
(212) 258-6000
http://www.nick.com/mynick/write_nick/mail.jhtml

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Georgia Gun Rights Under Attack

Military Police Staff Sergeant SC State Guard, Mack Williams faces trial for pulling out his permitted weapon in a successful attempt to stop a man physically assaulting himself and fiance. He is charged with "disorderly conduct" and "pointing a gun at another". Both Williams and his fiance have been prevented from pressing charges against their attacker. If you're familiar with GA Senate Bill 12 and HB 615, you know how suspicious the timing is. ADD MACK AS YOUR FRIEND ON FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=148400194&ref=ts